Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 F. App'x 759
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2013·No. 10-55237·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 06 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

SAMUEL QUINTON BONNER, No. 10-55237

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:99-cv-00091-DOC- MAN v. Central District of California, Santa Ana TERRI GONZALEZ, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee. AMENDING ORDER

Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG, District Judge.*

The memorandum disposition filed on May 16, 2013, is hereby amended as

follows:

Page 2, line 17, delete “twenty-nine months” and insert “twenty-one months” in its place.

With this amendment, the Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing is DENIED.

The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no

judge requested a vote for en banc consideration. Petitioner’s Motion for

* The Honorable Richard Seeborg, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Rehearing En Banc is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or

rehearing en banc will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez, (9th Cir. 2013).

Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez (Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.