Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 06 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
SAMUEL QUINTON BONNER, No. 10-55237
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:99-cv-00091-DOC- MAN v. Central District of California, Santa Ana TERRI GONZALEZ, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee. AMENDING ORDER
Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG, District Judge.*
The memorandum disposition filed on May 16, 2013, is hereby amended as
follows:
Page 2, line 17, delete “twenty-nine months” and insert “twenty-one months” in its place.
With this amendment, the Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing is DENIED.
The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no
judge requested a vote for en banc consideration. Petitioner’s Motion for
* The Honorable Richard Seeborg, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Rehearing En Banc is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or
rehearing en banc will be entertained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez (Samuel Bonner v. Terri Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.