Samuel Barker v. H2 Law, LLC and Autumn Harrell

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 26, 2022·No. 2022-C-0629·Published

Opinion

SAMUEL BARKER * NO. 2022-C-0629

VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL H2 LAW, LLC AND AUTUMN * HARRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA *******

APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2017-01747, DIVISION “E” Honorable Omar Mason, Judge ****** Judge Tiffany Gautier Chase ****** On Application for Rehearing

(Court composed of Judge Roland L. Belsome, Judge Paula A. Brown, Judge Tiffany Gautier Chase)

Ralph R. Alexis, III Glenn B. Adams Corey D. Moll PORTEUS, HAINKEL, AND JOHNSON, LLP 704 Carondelet Street New Orleans, LA 70130

COUNSEL FOR RELATOR

Samuel Barker Pro Se

PRO SE RESPONDENT

REHEARING GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED; APPELLATE JUDGMENT OF OCTOBER 10, 2022 MAINTAINED OCTOBER 26, 2022 TGC RLB PA B Respondent/Plaintiff, Samuel Barker (hereinafter “Mr. Barker”), requests

reconsideration of our previous opinion rendered on October 10, 2022, in the

above captioned case. Based on Mr. Barker’s filings with this Court, we hereby

grant rehearing for the sole purpose of considering Mr. Barker’s opposition to the

original writ application filed by Relators/Defendants, H2 Law LLC and Autumn

Harrell (hereinafter collectively referred to as “H2 Law”). For the foregoing

reasons, we grant rehearing, deny relief and maintain our original judgment of

October 10, 2022.

On September 22, 2022, H2 Law filed a writ application with this Court

requesting review of the trial court’s judgment on its peremptory exception of no

cause of action, which the trial court granted in part and denied in part, as to H2

Law’s legal malpractice claim. This Court requested a per curiam from the trial

court which was received several days later.

A review of the supervisory writ application indicated that H2 Law’s

arguments had merit. Thus, on October 10, 2022, this Court issued an opinion

reversing the trial court’s denial of H2 Law’s exception of no cause of action. A copy of the opinion was transmitted to all parties including Mr. Barker. Two days

later, on October 12, 2022, this Court received correspondence from Mr. Barker,

who is incarcerated, indicating his intent to file an opposition to H2 Law’s

application for supervisory writ.1 Thus, in the interest of justice, and in order to

give Mr. Barker the opportunity to oppose the writ application, this Court issued an

order permitting him an opportunity to file an opposition.2

This Court received “Plaintiff’s Preliminary Objections to the Judgment an

[sic] Alternative Notices” on October 20, 2022. The next day, Mr. Barker’s

“Objection to Status as Rehearing” was received. Mr. Barker’s preliminary

objections and alternative notices sets forth reasons as to why he believes this

Court erred in its October 10, 2022 opinion. Mr. Barker’s “Objections to Status as

Rehearing” reiterates his position argued in the trial court that H2 Law failed to

provide adequate legal services to him. Essentially, Mr. Barker’s objections

attempt to re-argue his legal malpractice claim.

1 Mr. Barker contends that he requested to file an opposition to H2 Law’s writ application six

days prior to publication of this opinion. Mr. Barker’s request to file an opposition is dated October 4, 2022; however, that date indicates when Mr. Barker’s request was received by the Legal Programs Department at Louisiana’s State Penitentiary. This Court received notice of Mr. Barker’s request on October 12, 2022, two days after the opinion was released in this matter. 2 Procedurally, this Court decided not to withdraw its opinion as Rule 16, Local Rules, Court of

Appeal, Fourth Circuit Court, provides that this Court may adjudicate the [writ] application at any time after receipt, with or without the benefit of response.

3 Accordingly, after reviewing Mr. Barker’s filings, we find that he fails to

produce any legal basis to support his arguments or warrant an amendment to this

Court’s original opinion. We therefore maintain our original opinion of October

10, 2022.

REHEARING GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED; APPELLATE JUDGMENT OF OCTOBER 10, 2022 MAINTAINED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Barker v. H2 Law, LLC and Autumn Harrell, (La. Ct. App. 2022).

Samuel Barker v. H2 Law, LLC and Autumn Harrell (Samuel Barker v. H2 Law, LLC and Autumn Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.