Samuel Bailey's Adm'rs v. Robt. Cochran's Adm'r
2 N.C. 120
This text of 2 N.C. 120 (Samuel Bailey's Adm'rs v. Robt. Cochran's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Samuel Bailey's Adm'rs v. Robt. Cochran's Adm'r, 2 N.C. 120 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).
Opinion
Noth. — The plea of the repeal of the letters would come as a plea puis darrein continuance, anti therefore not allowable, except plead at the proper time. See Chit. Plead. 636. Whether the act of one administrator is binding upon the others, see Mangum’s adm'rs. v. Sims, 1 Car. Law Rep. 547.—Gordon v. Finlay, 3 Hawks, 239.—Toller on Ex'rs. 403.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-baileys-admrs-v-robt-cochrans-admr-ncsuperct-1794.