Samuel Bailey's Adm'rs v. Robt. Cochran's Adm'r
2 N.C. 120
Opinion
Noth. — The plea of the repeal of the letters would come as a plea puis darrein continuance, anti therefore not allowable, except plead at the proper time. See Chit. Plead. 636. Whether the act of one administrator is binding upon the others, see Mangum’s adm'rs. v. Sims, 1 Car. Law Rep. 547.—Gordon v. Finlay, 3 Hawks, 239.—Toller on Ex'rs. 403.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel Bailey's Adm'rs v. Robt. Cochran's Adm'r, 2 N.C. 120 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).
2 N.C. 120 (Samuel Bailey's Adm'rs v. Robt. Cochran's Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.