Samuel B. Field and Joseph S. Pruitt v. James T. Powell and John S. Daisy

283 U.S. 797
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 18, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 283 U.S. 797 (Samuel B. Field and Joseph S. Pruitt v. James T. Powell and John S. Daisy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samuel B. Field and Joseph S. Pruitt v. James T. Powell and John S. Daisy, 283 U.S. 797 (1931).

Opinion

283 U.S. 797

51 S.Ct. 490

75 L.Ed. 1421

Samuel B. FIELD and Joseph S. Pruitt, appellants,
v.
James T. POWELL and John S. Daisy.

No. ___.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 27, 1931

Appeal allowed and Nellie Field Burwell, sole executrix, substituted as a party appellant in place of Samuel B. Field, deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Field v. Powell
283 U.S. 797 (Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 U.S. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samuel-b-field-and-joseph-s-pruitt-v-james-t-powell-and-john-s-daisy-scotus-1931.