Samuel Alejandro Garza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 13, 2014·No. 14-14-00225-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted; Order filed November 13, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00225-CR ____________

SAMUEL ALEJANDRO GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1270337

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has filed a motion for access to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 338th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before December 1, 2014; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel Alejandro Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Samuel Alejandro Garza v. State (Samuel Alejandro Garza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Gainous v. State
436 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)