Samuel A. Newman and Helen B. Newman, His Wife v. Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal Revenue
239 F.2d 384, 51 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 381, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5255
Opinion
The interesting issue presented by this appeal is covered fully and correctly by the findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion of the court below, 141 F. Supp. 37. No useful purpose would be served by repeating here what was said by the trial court.
The judgment of the court below therefore will be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Marsh.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Samuel A. Newman and Helen B. Newman, His Wife v. Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal Revenue, 239 F.2d 384, 51 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 381, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5255 (3d Cir. 1957).
239 F.2d 384 (Samuel A. Newman and Helen B. Newman, His Wife v. Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Southern Utilities
555 F. Supp. 206 (M.D. Georgia, 1983)
Arthur Company v. Chicago Paints, Inc.
175 F. Supp. 50 (D. Minnesota, 1959)