Samsung America, Inc. v. Noah

209 A.D.2d 367, 619 N.Y.S.2d 260
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 29, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 367 (Samsung America, Inc. v. Noah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samsung America, Inc. v. Noah, 209 A.D.2d 367, 619 N.Y.S.2d 260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered January 6, 1994, which, after nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the total sum of $113,851.23 under the guaranty agreement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A prima facie right to recover under a guaranty agreement is established by showing the execution thereof and a failure to pay in accordance therewith (117-14 Union Turnpike Assocs. v County Dollar Corp., 187 AD2d 357). The court properly found that both requirements had been met, and we perceive no basis for setting aside the determination made by the Trial Judge, who was in the best position to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses and determine the weight to be accorded to the documentary evidence submitted by the parties. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Layden v. Boccio
253 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Money Store of New York, Inc. v. Kuprianchik
240 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 367, 619 N.Y.S.2d 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samsung-america-inc-v-noah-nyappdiv-1994.