Samson v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Samson v. Caterpillar, Inc.

156 A.D.2d 300, 548 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15853

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.2d 300 (Samson v. Caterpillar, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samson v. Caterpillar, Inc., 156 A.D.2d 300, 548 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about June 10, 1988, which denied the motion of third-party defendant Canarsie Auto Salvage, Inc. to transfer venue of this action from Bronx County to Westchester County, and granted the cross motion of plaintiff to transfer venue from Bronx County to Kings County, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances of the instant case, there was no abuse of discretion in granting plaintiffs cross motion to transfer venue to Kings County, since the cause of action arose in Kings County, plaintiff was treated at two hospitals, both located in Kings County, and all but one of the defendants has its principal place of business in Kings County. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Milonas, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about June 10, 1988, which denied the motion of third-party defendant Canarsie Auto Salvage, Inc. to transfer venue of this action from Bronx County to Westchester County, and granted the cross motion of plaintiff to transfer venue from Bronx County to Kings County, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances of the instant case, there was no abuse of discretion in granting plaintiffs cross motion to transfer venue to Kings County, since the cause of action arose in Kings County, plaintiff was treated at two hospitals, both located in Kings County, and all but one of the defendants has its principal place of business in Kings County. Concur—Ross, J. P., Asch, Milonas, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.2d 300, 548 N.Y.S.2d 685, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samson-v-caterpillar-inc-nyappdiv-1989.