Samson Peter Rodriguez v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2016·No. 4D15-800·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SAMSON PETER RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-0800

[February 3, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-10093CF10A.

Samson Peter Rodriguez, Indiantown, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We accept the state’s concession of error on appeal, vacate the order of the trial court entered November 21, 2014, and remand with directions that the trial court grant appellant an evidentiary hearing on his claim that counsel retained by appellant’s father failed to timely file an amended motion for post-conviction relief, as permitted in Rodriguez v. State, 100 So. 3d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). See Medrano v. State, 748 So. 2d 986, 987 (Fla. 1999); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1999).

Reversed and remanded with directions. GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samson Peter Rodriguez v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Samson Peter Rodriguez v. State of Florida (Samson Peter Rodriguez v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Medrano v. State
748 So. 2d 986 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Rodriguez v. State
100 So. 3d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)