Samson Martin v. State of Florida
This text of 185 So. 3d 621 (Samson Martin v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
SAMSON MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D15-1625
[February 3, 2016]
Appeal of orders denying rule 3.850 and 3.800(a) motions from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lisa M. Porter, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-003228 CF10B.
Samson Martin, Mayo, pro se.
No brief required for appellee.
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
We grant in part the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but only to clarify that the defendant’s appeal is from the denial of both his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We otherwise deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing in all other respects, and thereby maintain our affirmance of the defendant’s appeal on the merits. See Martinez v. State, 169 So. 3d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 So. 3d 621, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samson-martin-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.