Sams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sams v. State

844 So. 2d 809, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7020, 2003 WL 21077449

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 14, 2003

DocketNo. 3D03-753

StatusPublished

This text of 844 So. 2d 809 (Sams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sams v. State, 844 So. 2d 809, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7020, 2003 WL 21077449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper partial confession of error, the defendant’s conviction and sentence as to Count IV is hereby vacated. See Fjord v. State, 634 So.2d 714, 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). However, we affirm the remainder of the order denying the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Seccia v. State, 720 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Waldburg v. State, 644 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

[810]*810Affirmed in part, reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper partial confession of error, the defendant’s conviction and sentence as to Count IV is hereby vacated. See Fjord v. State, 634 So.2d 714, 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). However, we affirm the remainder of the order denying the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Seccia v. State, 720 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Waldburg v. State, 644 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

[810]*810Affirmed in part, reversed, in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

844 So. 2d 809, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7020, 2003 WL 21077449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sams-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack