Sams v. Champion

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sams v. Champion

361 S.E.2d 852, 184 Ga. App. 444, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2300

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 2, 1987

Docket75205

StatusPublished

This text of 361 S.E.2d 852 (Sams v. Champion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sams v. Champion, 361 S.E.2d 852, 184 Ga. App. 444, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2300 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

In this case the appellee took the deposition of a witness, but afterwards decided against having the court reporter transcribe it. In fact, the appellee paid the court reporter for the services rendered and got all of the take-down notes from the reporter. Subsequently, the appellants sought to obtain a copy of the deposition, quite willing to pay for it, but the appellee refused to surrender the take-down notes. The appellants then requested the trial court to order release of the take-down notes so that the deposition could be transcribed. However, being of the mind that the take-down notes belonged to the party who had paid for the deposition, and that the appellants could simply depose the witness on their own or subpoena the witness for the trial, the trial court denied the request. This interlocutory appeal followed.

OCGA § 9-11-30 (c) (1), in part, provides that deposition “testimony shall be taken stenographically or recorded by any other means ordered in accordance with paragraph (4) of subsection (b) of this Code section. If requested by one of the parties, the testimony shall be transcribed.” (Emphasis supplied.) Further, OCGA § 9-11-30 (f) (2) provides that “[u]pon payment of reasonable charges therefor, the officer shall furnish a copy of the deposition to any party or to the deponent.” These Code provisions quite clearly give the appellants the right to have the deposition transcribed and to have a copy of the deposition, provided they pay for it. But compare Harrington v. Harrington, 224 Ga. 305 (161 SE2d 862) (1968) and Tow v. Reed, 180 Ga. App. 609 (349 SE2d 829) (1986) with Georgia American Ins. Co. v. Varnum, 182 Ga. App. 907 (357 SE2d 609) (1987).

Judgment reversed.

Birdsong, C. J., and Pope, J., concur. [445]*445Decided October 2, 1987. Rex D. Smith, Douglas F. Aholt, for appellants. J. Blair Craig II, Robert P. Mallis, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

In this case the appellee took the deposition of a witness, but afterwards decided against having the court reporter transcribe it. In fact, the appellee paid the court reporter for the services rendered and got all of the take-down notes from the reporter. Subsequently, the appellants sought to obtain a copy of the deposition, quite willing to pay for it, but the appellee refused to surrender the take-down notes. The appellants then requested the trial court to order release of the take-down notes so that the deposition could be transcribed. However, being of the mind that the take-down notes belonged to the party who had paid for the deposition, and that the appellants could simply depose the witness on their own or subpoena the witness for the trial, the trial court denied the request. This interlocutory appeal followed.

OCGA § 9-11-30 (c) (1), in part, provides that deposition “testimony shall be taken stenographically or recorded by any other means ordered in accordance with paragraph (4) of subsection (b) of this Code section. If requested by one of the parties, the testimony shall be transcribed.” (Emphasis supplied.) Further, OCGA § 9-11-30 (f) (2) provides that “[u]pon payment of reasonable charges therefor, the officer shall furnish a copy of the deposition to any party or to the deponent.” These Code provisions quite clearly give the appellants the right to have the deposition transcribed and to have a copy of the deposition, provided they pay for it. But compare Harrington v. Harrington, 224 Ga. 305 (161 SE2d 862) (1968) and Tow v. Reed, 180 Ga. App. 609 (349 SE2d 829) (1986) with Georgia American Ins. Co. v. Varnum, 182 Ga. App. 907 (357 SE2d 609) (1987).

Judgment reversed.

Birdsong, C. J., and Pope, J., concur. [445]*445Decided October 2, 1987. Rex D. Smith, Douglas F. Aholt, for appellants. J. Blair Craig II, Robert P. Mallis, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

361 S.E.2d 852, 184 Ga. App. 444, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sams-v-champion-gactapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack