Sampson v. State
122 S.E. 739, 32 Ga. App. 76, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 271
This text of 122 S.E. 739 (Sampson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sampson v. State, 122 S.E. 739, 32 Ga. App. 76, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 271 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
1. In view of the note of the trial judge this court cannot say that the overruling of the motion for continuance was error.
2. The verdicr was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.
•Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 S.E. 739, 32 Ga. App. 76, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-state-gactapp-1924.