Sampson v. State
This text of 687 So. 2d 362 (Sampson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, grounded on his claim that he entered into his plea based on the erroneous advice of his counsel that the charge for violation of community control had been dismissed, when in fact he received a consecutive sentence for that violation, extending his sentence by three years. See Middleton v. State, 603 So.2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Jones v. State, 671 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We therefore reverse and remand for attachment [363]*363of portions of the record or for an evidentiary hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 So. 2d 362, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 990, 1997 WL 55679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.