Sampson v. State

268 So. 2d 467
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 1972·No. No. 72-68·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sampson v. State, 268 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

268 So. 2d 467 (Sampson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sampson
317 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)