Sampson v. Rockingham County Regional Jail

3 F. App'x 163
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2001·No. 00-7620·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert E. Sampson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sampson v. Rockingham Cnty Jail, No. CA-00-793-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sampson v. Rockingham County Regional Jail, 3 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2001).

3 F. App'x 163 (Sampson v. Rockingham County Regional Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sampson v. Dotson
W.D. Virginia, 2024