Sampson v. Rainbow Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.

60 A.D.3d 1362, 874 N.Y.S.2d 845

This text of 60 A.D.3d 1362 (Sampson v. Rainbow Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sampson v. Rainbow Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc., 60 A.D.3d 1362, 874 N.Y.S.2d 845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered December 5, 2007 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff for summary judgment and [1363]*1363denied the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We write only to note that the contention of defendant and third-party plaintiff that Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6) bars plaintiffs action against it is raised for the first time on appeal, and we therefore do not consider it (see Oram v Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840 [1994]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Centra, Garni and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oram v. Capone
206 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.3d 1362, 874 N.Y.S.2d 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-rainbow-ford-lincoln-mercury-inc-nyappdiv-2009.