Sampson v. Hammond
4 Cal. 184
This text of 4 Cal. 184 (Sampson v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sampson v. Hammond, 4 Cal. 184 (Cal. 1854).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Court below erred in nonsuiting the plaintiff, on the ground that he could not maintain an action for timber, unless the same was cut or felled by himself.
As soon as the logs were cut, they became the property of the plaintiff, by virtue of his lease, and the action of trover was the proper remedy.
Judgment reversed with costs, and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Trust & Savings Bank v. Brusnahan
147 N.E. 168 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925)
Brady v. . Brady
77 S.E. 235 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Michigan Land & Iron Co. v. Deer Lake Co.
27 N.W. 10 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. Swinney
97 Ind. 586 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Tyson v. McGuineas
25 Wis. 656 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1870)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-hammond-cal-1854.