Sampson v. Coy

15 Mass. 493
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 15, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 15 Mass. 493 (Sampson v. Coy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sampson v. Coy, 15 Mass. 493 (Mass. 1819).

Opinion

Curia.

The general principle is that, under alla enormia, nothing can be given in evidence which would of itself form a substantia] ground of action ; but such matter should be specially averred. The reason is, that the defendant cannot be supposed to come prepared to defend against any cause of action of which he has no notice in the declaration.

Thus, under the allegation of breaking and entering the dwelling-house, evidence may be given of keeping the plaintiff out; because that is a consequence of the wrongful entry ; and the time need not be specially averred. But an assault and battery cannot be proved, for the reasons aforesaid,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gray v. Tobin
252 Mass. 238 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Peshine v. Shepperson
94 Am. Dec. 468 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1867)
Wadsworth v. Treat
43 Me. 163 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1857)
Laing v. Colder
8 Pa. 479 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Mass. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-coy-mass-1819.