Sampson v. City of Cambridge

Fourth Circuit

Sampson v. City of Cambridge

322 F. App'x 295

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 16, 2009·No. No. 08-1691·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ina Sampson appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sampson v. City of Cambridge, No. l:06-cv-01819-WDQ (D. Md. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ina Sampson appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sampson v. City of Cambridge, No. l:06-cv-01819-WDQ (D. Md. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sampson v. City of Cambridge, 322 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

322 F. App'x 295 (Sampson v. City of Cambridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related