Sampson v. City of Cambridge
This text of Sampson v. City of Cambridge (Sampson v. City of Cambridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1691
INA SAMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-01819-WDQ)
Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 16, 2009
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
R. Scott Oswald, Adam Augustine Carter, Gregory Sharma-Holt, THE EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Kevin Karpinski, Victoria M. Shearer, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ina Sampson appeals the district court’s order
granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Sampson v. City of Cambridge, No. 1:06-cv-01819-WDQ (D. Md.
June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sampson v. City of Cambridge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-city-of-cambridge-ca4-2009.