Sampson v. Bryce

5 Munf. 175, 19 Va. 175, 1816 Va. LEXIS 26
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided October 19, 1816·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

1. A JL fa against the estate of a testator, cannot lawfully be levied on slaves which, being specifically bequeathed, are in the possession of the legatees, as their property, either by actual delivery from the Executor, or by his permission. See Burnley v. Lambert, 1 Wash. 308— 313, accordant.

2. In such case a Court of Equity may award an Injunction to prevent the sale of the property. See Randolph v. Randolph, &c. 3 Munf. 99 ; and Wilson Sf Trent v. Butler and others. Ibid 559,

UPON an Appeal from a Decree of the late Chancellor Wtthe, pronounced the 10th of March 1803.

And this Decree was affirms» by the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sampson v. Bryce, 5 Munf. 175, 19 Va. 175, 1816 Va. LEXIS 26 (Va. 1816).

5 Munf. 175 (Sampson v. Bryce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClung v. Sieg
46 S.E. 210 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1903)
Baker v. Rinehard
11 W. Va. 238 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1877)
Paine v. Tutwiler
27 Va. 440 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1876)
Bowyer v. Creigh
3 Va. 25 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1825)