Samples v. Nanney

Sixth Circuit

Samples v. Nanney

166 F.2d 1022, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2405

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 15, 1948

DocketNo. 10463

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 1022 (Samples v. Nanney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samples v. Nanney, 166 F.2d 1022, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2405 (6th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was submitted upon the record and briefs; and it appearing that no exception was taken to the charge of the court, and that appellants’ requests for charges which were refused by the court were inapplicable to the facts of the case; and it appearing that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the motion for new trial; and no reversible error appearing in the record: it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was submitted upon the record and briefs; and it appearing that no exception was taken to the charge of the court, and that appellants’ requests for charges which were refused by the court were inapplicable to the facts of the case; and it appearing that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the motion for new trial; and no reversible error appearing in the record: it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 1022, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samples-v-nanney-ca6-1948.