Sample v. Monsanto Chemical Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sample v. Monsanto Chemical Co.

664 S.W.2d 625, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 3469

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 1984

DocketNo. 46819

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 664 S.W.2d 625 (Sample v. Monsanto Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sample v. Monsanto Chemical Co., 664 S.W.2d 625, 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 3469 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

SNYDER, Presiding Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found claimant Denver Sample was perma[626]*626nently and totally disabled. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modified the award of the ALJ by entering an award of permanent partial disability. The circuit court of St. Louis County affirmed the Commission’s award. Sample appeals from the judgment of the circuit court.

Appellate review of a decision of the Commission is limited to a determination of whether the award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Gerleman v. Sterling Engineering Co., 629 S.W.2d 676, 678 (Mo.App.1982). This court reviews not the award of the ALJ, but the award of the Commission. Skinner v. Dawson Metal Products, 575 S.W.2d 935, 938 (Mo.App.1978).

This court determines that the award of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

STEWART, J., and RONALD M. BELT, Special Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI