Sample v. Eaton

302 P.2d 431, 145 Cal. App. 2d 312, 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 1337
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 23, 1956
DocketCiv. 21476
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 302 P.2d 431 (Sample v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sample v. Eaton, 302 P.2d 431, 145 Cal. App. 2d 312, 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 1337 (Cal. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

WOOD (Parker), J.

Action for damages for personal injuries sustained by a spectator at a wrestling exhibition, when he was struck by a bottle of Coca-Cola that was thrown by another spectator. The defendants were: the proprietor of the wrestling club that conducted the exhibition; and one of the operators of the refreshment concession at the exhibition. In a jury trial, a nonsuit was granted. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of nonsuit.

On June 4,1952, plaintiff attended a wrestling exhibition at the Olympic Auditorium in Los Angeles. He had attended wrestling matches regularly at that place for approximately four years. On said June 4 he paid the required admission fee and sat in the end seat of the press row, apparently the row next to the wrestling ring. The wrestlers in the main event were one Romero and Dangerous Danny MeShane.

Plaintiff testified that for approximately five minutes before the first fall in the main event, MeShane was very rough, was pulling hair, pulling trunks and jumping outside the ring; for two or three minutes before and two or three minutes after the first fall, the spectators on the opposite *314 side of the ring from plaintiff were jumping up, fighting, booing and throwing paper cups, peanut sacks and “stuff like that” into the ring, and several persons were standing in the aisle shouting and throwing various articles; after the first fall McShane “strutted” around the ring, shouted at the customers on the opposite side of the ring (opposite plaintiff) and shook his fist at them; plaintiff stopped looking at the customers in order to talk to defendant Mr. Baton, who had come to the place where plaintiff was sitting (plaintiff and Mr. Baton were acquaintances); then plaintiff heard a commotion and turned, “and all of a sudden a terrific force hit me [him] in the mouth”; he looked down and saw that a full bottle of “coke” had fallen on his foot. He testified further that one of his teeth had cut through his upper lip, several of his teeth were loosened, and his jaw was broken.

On cross-examination he testified that about three or four minutes elapsed between the first fall and the time that he was struck in the mouth by the Coca-Cola bottle; he did not know where the bottle came from; on previous occasions when he had purchased liquid refreshment at the auditorium, the vendor put the refreshment in a paper cup; while he was in the dressing room receiving treatment for his injuries, the man who threw the bottle was brought into the room; the man said that he “lost his head” and threw the bottle.

Defendant Alvah M. Baton testified that he was the sole proprietor of the Olympic Boxing and Wrestling Club; he conducted the activities of the club at the Olympic Auditorium in Los Angeles; there was a 20-foot-square wrestling ring in the center of the auditorium; the ring was enclosed by ropes and was surrounded by a ledge that was 2 to 4 feet wide; the seating capacity of the auditorium was 10,400; he employed ushers, private police and Los Angeles police officers to maintain order—the number employed at any event depended on the number of spectators expected; he estimated that about 5,000 spectators were present the night that plaintiff was injured; he did not know how many employees were on duty that night; at any wrestling or boxing match the spectators become excited, and sometimes they are more excited than at other times; Romero and McShane were known in the wrestling profession to be good drawing attractions; McShane was considered to be a rougher type of wrestler than the usual wrestler. Mr. Baton also testified that he had a rule that a bottle should not be given to a spectator; he had instructed his employees not to permit a spectator to obtain possession *315 of a bottle under any circumstance; he had not instructed the ushers, vendors, private guards or police officers, who were employed by him, to quell a disturbance that might arise; he had seen spectators at the anditorium throw paper cups, popcorn wrappers, cigar butts and articles of that kind on occasions previous to the night that plaintiff was injured; it was very seldom that he had seen such throwing; he had instructed his employees to stop spectators from throwing things. Mr. Baton testified further that he was in the immediate presence of plaintiff at the time plaintiff was injured; he saw plaintiff immediately after plaintiff was struck; plaintiff was bleeding slightly at the mouth at that time.

Mrs. Lopez testified that she attended a wrestling match at the Olympic Auditorium in Los Angeles when Romero and McShane were the contestants; she sat next to the aisle in the 10th or 12th row from the ring; for four or five minutes before the first fall, McShane pulled Romero’s trunks and hair; everyone was excited and very angry, especially the man who sat across the aisle from her to her left (later identified as the man who threw the bottle) ; the man used bad language before the match began and became angry when McShane bit Romero; the man used very bad language and threw cups during the four or five minutes before the first fall; McShane went outside the ropes, onto the ledge surrounding the ring, and then (upon returning to the ring) gave Romero the “atomic bomb” or “drop”; the referee raised McShane’s hand (indicating that McShane had won the fall); at that time, a boy about 17 years of age, who was carrying a tray containing Coca-Cola bottles, stood in the aisle close to the man who sat across the aisle from her; the boy was looking at the wrestling ring; the man took a Coca-Cola bottle from the tray with his right hand and threw the bottle at McShane who was in the ring; the boy “didn’t do anything” when the man took the bottle; she saw the bottle strike plaintiff who was seated in the first row on the opposite side of the ring from where she was seated.

Defendant Mrs. Baton testified that there was an arrangement with her husband, Alvah M. Baton, whereby she and her husband’s father, Edwin Baton, had and operated the concessions at the Olympic Auditorium; she and Edwin Baton operated the concessions under the name of Olympic Auditorium Concessions; all the “cokes” dispensed at the auditorium from the cases carried by the vendors were dispensed by employees of Olympic Auditorium Concessions; the vendors *316 were instructed to retain all full and all empty Coca-Cola bottles, not to release the bottles, and to watch the bottles to the extent that they would not get out of the vendors’ possession.

“A motion for nonsuit may properly be granted ‘ . . . when, and only when, disregarding conflicting evidence, and giving to plaintiff’s evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn from that evidence, the result is a determination that there is no evidence of sufficient substantiality to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.’ [Citations.] ‘Unless it can be said as a matter of law, that ... no other reasonable conclusion is legally deducible from the evidence . . . the trial court is not justified in taking the case from the jury. ’ [Citations.]” (Palmquist v. Mercer, 43 Cal.2d 92, 95 [272 P.2d 26].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noble v. Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc.
168 Cal. App. 3d 912 (California Court of Appeal, 1985)
Morris v. Thogmartin
29 Cal. App. 3d 922 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
Pabón Escabí v. Axtmayer
90 P.R. 20 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)
Sorensen v. Hutson
346 P.2d 785 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Hunter v. Mohawk Petroleum Corporation
334 P.2d 193 (California Supreme Court, 1959)
Rufo v. N. B. C. National Broadcasting Co.
334 P.2d 16 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Jesters v. Taylor
105 So. 2d 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Newman v. Clinton Cafeteria Co.
315 P.2d 64 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 P.2d 431, 145 Cal. App. 2d 312, 1956 Cal. App. LEXIS 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sample-v-eaton-calctapp-1956.