Samper v. University of Rochester

144 A.D.2d 940
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1988·No. Appeal No. 3·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court should not have dismissed plaintiffs’ [941]*941cause of action alleging discrimination under Civil Rights Law §§ 40-c and 40-d against defendants University of Rochester, Strong Memorial Hospital, and Ronald A. Gabel, M.D. Since plaintiffs alleged sufficient facts to sustain a cause of action under the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 [1] [a]) against these defendants, the cause of action under the Civil Rights Law must likewise be sustained (see, People v Hamilton, 125 AD2d 1000, 1001). (Appeal from order and judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wesley, J. — renewal.) Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samper v. University of Rochester, 144 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

144 A.D.2d 940 (Samper v. University of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. PL Long Beach, LLC
74 A.D.3d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Ganzy v. Allen Christian School
995 F. Supp. 340 (E.D. New York, 1998)