Samper v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 418
United States Customs Court·Decided February 26, 1957·No. No. 60522; protest 262825-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that four bales of twine reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samper v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 418 (cusc 1957).

38 Cust. Ct. 418 (Samper v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.