Sampayo v. Salter

21 F. Cas. 286, 1 Mason C.C. 43
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 F. Cas. 286 (Sampayo v. Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sampayo v. Salter, 21 F. Cas. 286, 1 Mason C.C. 43 (circtdnh 1816).

Opinion

STORY. Circuit Justice.

There is no pre-tence for the claim of freight in this case. The freight for the whole voyage cannot be due, for it was never performed, and was defeated by the capture. As to a pro rata freight, the claim is as little supported. The doctrine upon this subject in Luke v. Lyde, 2 Burrows, 8. 82. and other subsequent cases, rests upon the ground, that there is a voluntary receipt of the goods at an intermediate port of the voyage, and an agreement to dispense with the party’s transporting them farther. But it never has been supposed, that a pro rats, freight was due. when by a capture the party has been incapable of performing the voyage, and the shipper has been compelled to receive his goods at the hands of the admiralty. The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to a verdict for the whole sum in controversy.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens v. Breitung
270 F. 190 (Second Circuit, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F. Cas. 286, 1 Mason C.C. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampayo-v-salter-circtdnh-1816.