Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo
This text of Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo (Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00325-CV
SAMOTTA RICHARDSON APPELLANT
V.
MARKOS S. WODAJO APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 067-259343-12
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On September 19, 2014, we denied appellant’s “Response To Late Brief
Notice,” which we liberally construed as a motion for extension of time based on
repeated requests from appellant that this court has already denied. We stated
that if appellant’s brief is not filed in this court by Monday, September 29, 2014,
this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 23, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samotta Richardson v. Markos S. Wodajo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samotta-richardson-v-markos-s-wodajo-texapp-2014.