Samoroukov v. Kamenev

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Samoroukov v. Kamenev

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 14, 2017

Docket2017 NYSlipOp 50473(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Samoroukov v. Kamenev (Samoroukov v. Kamenev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samoroukov v. Kamenev, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Kirill Samoroukov, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Vladimir Kamenev, Defendant-Respondent.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered March 1, 2016, which denied his motion for an award of costs and disbursements.

Per Curiam.

Order (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered March 1, 2016, affirmed, without costs.

We find no abuse of discretion in the denial of statutory costs to plaintiff, where both the complaint and the counterclaims were dismissed (see CPLR 8101; Michaels v Cooper, 245 AD2d 1103 [1997]; Raab v Dumblewski, 226 AD2d 1021, 1024 [1996]; see also 14 Weinstein—Korn—Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 8101.15 [2nd ed]). Nor is plaintiff entitled to disbursements (see CPLR 8301[a], [c]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: April 14, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI