Samons v. Meymandi
This text of 178 S.E.2d 225 (Samons v. Meymandi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Katherine E. Kivett SAMONS
v.
Dr. Assd MEYMANDI, Dr. Jerbert W. Vick and Frank Ceruzzi.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Downing, Downing & David, for plaintiff.
Butler, High & Baer, Nance, Collier, Singleton, Kirkman & Herndon, for defendant Dr. Assad Meymandi.
McCoy, Weaver, Wiggins, Cleveland & Raper, Richard M. Wiggins, Marion C. George, Jr., for defendant Herbert W. Vick.
Anderson, Nimocks & Broadfoot, for defendant Frank Ceruzzi.
Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 9 N.C.App. 490, 177 S.E.2d 209. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 S.E.2d 225, 277 N.C. 458, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samons-v-meymandi-nc-1971.