Samoff v. Local Union No. 542-A

341 F.2d 589, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 1965
Docket14944_1
StatusPublished

This text of 341 F.2d 589 (Samoff v. Local Union No. 542-A) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samoff v. Local Union No. 542-A, 341 F.2d 589, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6679 (3d Cir. 1965).

Opinion

341 F.2d 589

Bernard SAMOFF, Regional Director of the Fourth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
LOCAL UNION NO. 542-A, -B, -C, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 14944.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued January 18, 1965.

Decided February 2, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; William J. Nealon, Jr., Judge.

Martin J. Vigderman, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent-appellant.

Julius G. Serot, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Marvin Roth, Attys., N. L. R. B., on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the thorough and sound opinion of Judge Nealon, D.C., 238 F. Supp. 376, in this case. Schauffler for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. Local 1291, I.L.A., 292 F.2d 182 (3 Cir. 1961). The late decision of the National Labor Relations Board in Local Union No. 612, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc., 150 NLRB No. 40 (December 17, 1964) is radically different in its facts from the case at bar. That decision is in-apposite here.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 F.2d 589, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samoff-v-local-union-no-542-a-ca3-1965.