Sammye R. Holloway v. State of Ohio

197 F.3d 236, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18273, 1999 WL 1062750
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 1999
Docket96-3732
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 197 F.3d 236 (Sammye R. Holloway v. State of Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sammye R. Holloway v. State of Ohio, 197 F.3d 236, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18273, 1999 WL 1062750 (6th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 3, 1999, and the appel-lees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 4,1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 F.3d 236, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18273, 1999 WL 1062750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sammye-r-holloway-v-state-of-ohio-ca6-1999.