Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation

60 F.3d 744, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18064, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1664, 1995 WL 428366
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 20, 1995·No. 93-6406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation, 60 F.3d 744, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18064, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1664, 1995 WL 428366 (11th Cir. 1995).

60 F.3d 744 (Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fussell v. Georgia Ports Authority
906 F. Supp. 1561 (S.D. Georgia, 1995)