Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation

Eleventh Circuit

Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation

60 F.3d 744, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18064, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1664, 1995 WL 428366

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 1995

Docket93-6406

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 F.3d 744 (Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sammy Wilson v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery Corporation, 60 F.3d 744, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18064, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1664, 1995 WL 428366 (11th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI