Sammy Lee Kizzee, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 11, 2003
Docket06-02-00039-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Sammy Lee Kizzee, Jr. v. State (Sammy Lee Kizzee, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sammy Lee Kizzee, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-02-00039-CR
______________________________


SAMMY LEE KIZZEE, JR., Appellant


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court No. F01-73521-Q





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Sammy Lee Kizzee, Jr., (a/k/a Eddie Walker) (1) appeals his conviction for a robbery allegedly committed January 17, 2001, at a Super 8 Motel in Dallas, Texas. In his sole point of error regarding this appeal, Kizzee contends the trial court erred by denying his requested jury instruction on how the jury should determine whether the victim's fear was reasonable.

Kizzee was charged by indictment for three separate robberies. Those causes were consolidated for trial, and the jury found Kizzee guilty in each case. The cases have been appealed separately, but were consolidated by the parties for purposes of briefing before this Court. The other two appeals are appellate cause numbers 06-02-00035-CR and 06-02-00038-CR.

Since the issue and the arguments raised in this case are identical to an issue and the arguments presented in his other appeals, for the reasons stated in Kizzee v. State, No. 06-02-00035-CR, we find the trial court did not err by denying Kizzee's requested jury instruction in the case at bar on the reasonableness of the victim's fear.



We affirm the trial court's judgment.



Donald R. Ross

Justice



Date Submitted: January 17, 2003

Date Decided: February 11, 2003



Do Not Publish

1. In Cause Number 06-02-00035-CR, the defendant's name is listed as Sammy Kizzee, a/k/a Eddie Walker in the indictment and as Sammy Kizzee in the judgment. In Cause Number 06-02-00038-CR, it is listed as Eddie Walker in the indictment and as Eddie Walker Sammy Lee Kizzee in the judgment. In Cause Number 06-02-00039-CR, it is listed as Sammy Lee Kizzee Jr. in the indictment and in the judgment. We will refer to him as Sammy Kizzee.

t-family: 'Times New Roman', serif">MEMORANDUM OPINION


            Mario Anthony Gamboa appeals from his conviction by a jury for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on a public servant. Two cases were tried together. The jury assessed Gamboa's punishment at thirty-five years' imprisonment for the count in this case. The trial court sentenced Gamboa consistent with the jury's verdict. The cases have been appealed separately, but have been briefed together.

            Because the briefs and arguments raised therein are identical in both appeals, for the reasons stated in Gamboa v. State, No. 06-04-00157-CR, we likewise resolve the issues in this appeal in favor of the State.

            We affirm the judgment of the trial court.



                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice


Date Submitted:          August 23, 2005

Date Decided:             August 24, 2005


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sammy Lee Kizzee, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sammy-lee-kizzee-jr-v-state-texapp-2003.