Sammy H. Hassan v. William Perrill, Warden
This text of 34 F.3d 1076 (Sammy H. Hassan v. William Perrill, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
34 F.3d 1076
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Sammy H. HASSAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William PERRILL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 94-1181.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 23, 1994.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
Before MOORE, ANDERSON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth by the district court in its order of April 13, 1994.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 F.3d 1076, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 32019, 1994 WL 462175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sammy-h-hassan-v-william-perrill-warden-ca10-1994.