Sammis Group, Inc. v. Gliner
This text of 80 A.D.2d 873 (Sammis Group, Inc. v. Gliner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 6,. 1980, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. On its face, the plaintiff’s complaint states a valid cause of action for a real estate brokerage commission earned in connection with the proposed but unconsummated sale of the defendants’ home. (Cf. Miller Realty Corp. v Carpenter, 41 AD2d 564; see, also, Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633; Lane — Real Estate Dept. Store v Lawlet Corp., 28 NY2d 36.) Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 A.D.2d 873, 436 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sammis-group-inc-v-gliner-nyappdiv-1981.