Sammatano v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sammatano v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

238 A.D. 809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1933

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 809 (Sammatano v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sammatano v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 238 A.D. 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order striking out the separate defense contained in defendant’s answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In the circumstances here shown, the defendant should be permitted to avail itself of the Statute of Limitations as a defense if on the trial it is warranted by the facts disclosed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order striking out the separate defense contained in defendant’s answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In the circumstances here shown, the defendant should be permitted to avail itself of the Statute of Limitations as a defense if on the trial it is warranted by the facts disclosed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sammatano-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1933.