Samitier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Samitier v. State

654 So. 2d 308, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5019, 1995 WL 271523

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2568

StatusPublished

This text of 654 So. 2d 308 (Samitier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samitier v. State, 654 So. 2d 308, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5019, 1995 WL 271523 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence for manslaughter arising from the defendant Ricardo Samitier’s culpably negligent medical treatment in performing a plastic surgery operation on the deceased; the judgment and sentence were entered below based on an adverse jury verdict. We reject the defendant’s sole point on appeal: that the trial court erred in refusing to give three requested jury instructions— based on a holding that the requested charges were not supported by any competent evidence adduced at trial and were otherwise confusing and misleading. See Butler v. State, 493 So.2d 451, 452 (Fla.1986); Wilson v. State, 537 So.2d 176, 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Giordano v. Ramirez, 503 So.2d 947, 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review are, therefore, in all respects,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence for manslaughter arising from the defendant Ricardo Samitier’s culpably negligent medical treatment in performing a plastic surgery operation on the deceased; the judgment and sentence were entered below based on an adverse jury verdict. We reject the defendant’s sole point on appeal: that the trial court erred in refusing to give three requested jury instructions— based on a holding that the requested charges were not supported by any competent evidence adduced at trial and were otherwise confusing and misleading. See Butler v. State, 493 So.2d 451, 452 (Fla.1986); Wilson v. State, 537 So.2d 176, 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Giordano v. Ramirez, 503 So.2d 947, 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review are, therefore, in all respects,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

654 So. 2d 308, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5019, 1995 WL 271523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samitier-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack