Samila v. Brunel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Samila v. Brunel

470 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13934

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 1985

DocketNo. 84-259

StatusPublished

This text of 470 So. 2d 27 (Samila v. Brunel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samila v. Brunel, 470 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a fraud and conversion case. Because appel-lee failed to prove any of the alleged tor-tious conduct occurred within the statute of limitations time period, and because the evidence presented to support the verdict and judgment was legally insufficient, we reverse the judgment.

REVERSED.

COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a fraud and conversion case. Because appel-lee failed to prove any of the alleged tor-tious conduct occurred within the statute of limitations time period, and because the evidence presented to support the verdict and judgment was legally insufficient, we reverse the judgment.

REVERSED.

COBB, C.J., and DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

470 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1164, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samila-v-brunel-fladistctapp-1985.