Same v. Same

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Same v. Same

12 S.C.L. 408

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1821·Published

Opinion

_A.Ssoon as the order for judgment was set aside in tbit ease, the defendant’s counsel moved for leave to enter up judgment of non pros, which was refused,

A motion was submitted to reverse that order.— ’ But (here was nothing to support a judgment. The defendant had entered no appearance, neither had he filed n plea. This motion must also be dismissed.

Justices Nott, Johnson, Ganll, Richardson and ColcocIr, concurred. ' -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

_A.Ssoon as the order for judgment was set aside in tbit ease, the defendant’s counsel moved for leave to enter up judgment of non pros, which was refused,

A motion was submitted to reverse that order.— ’ But (here was nothing to support a judgment. The defendant had entered no appearance, neither had he filed n plea. This motion must also be dismissed.

Justices Nott, Johnson, Ganll, Richardson and ColcocIr, concurred. ' -

Same v. Same, 12 S.C.L. 408 (S.C. 1821).

Pincite

12 S.C.L. 408 (Same v. Same) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.