Same v. Same

67 Barb. 495
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1874
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Barb. 495 (Same v. Same) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Same v. Same, 67 Barb. 495 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Opinion

Hardin, J.

In this second action, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the unpaid instalments.

Courts of equity have jurisdiction to give such relief, even against executors and trustees. (1 Story's Eq., § 593. 3 Barb. Ch., 466.)

The evidence showed some funds in the hands of the executors, and they should therefore pay the sum past due to the plaintiff.

But the plaintiff, before entering the judgment, should [496]*496give the bond provided by the statute in such cases. The bond should be approved by a justice of this court, or a county judge, and filed, before the findings are signed and filed. There was no such bond tendered before suit brought, and therefore no costs will be recovered by the plaintiff, in this action.

[Onondaga Special Teem, December 7, 1874.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Siwdm, Justice.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cromer v. Pinckney
3 Barb. Ch. 466 (New York Court of Chancery, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Barb. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/same-v-same-nysupct-1874.