Same v. Same

3 Cow. 296
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Cow. 296 (Same v. Same) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Same v. Same, 3 Cow. 296 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Opinion

At another day, and when the Court came to decide the motionfin the last cause, they said that it disposed of this mor tion to set aside the inquisition, which' must be granted. But as to the motion for appointing elizors, they denied it j saying, that though the Sheriff had acted erroneously, he had' not acted partially ; that the objection of interest was so remote as' not, of itself, to be a disqualification. It went merely to the favor of the officer; and the Court were to deter- • mine from1 the facts, whether it would so far influence him1 as to render the execution of the writ of inquiry by him unsafe for the plaintiff. They did not think so. Upon the evidence before them', they were satisfied that the error was one of judgment merely,

Rule accordingly.''

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grinnell v. Bebb
85 N.W. 467 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
McCraven's Heirs v. Doe ex dem. McGuire
23 Miss. 100 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cow. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/same-v-same-nysupct-1824.