Samborsky v. Rothstein

S.D. New York

Samborsky v. Rothstein

DecidedApril 7, 2020

Docket1:20-cv-00298

StatusUnknown

This text of Samborsky v. Rothstein (Samborsky v. Rothstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Samborsky v. Rothstein, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Od AY FILED DATE RULED: 4/7/2020 MICHAEL SAMBORSKY, : Plaintiff, : -against- : 1:20-cv-00298-GHW SARA ROTHSTEIN, doing business as 32B] : ORDER Benefit Funds, ALBERTA GALDRI, doing : business as 32BJ Benefit Funds, and REGINE : BRETON doing business as : 32BJ Benefit Funds, : Defendants. : on X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Michael Samborsky’s application for the court to request pro bono counsel is denied without prejudice to renew at a later date. There is insufficient information before the Court at this time to make the necessary assessment of plaintiffs claims under the standards set forth by the Second Circuit in Hodge v. Police Officers, including whether plaintiffs claim is “likely to be of substance.” 802 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1986). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore 7” forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 US. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt No. 10. Defendants’ counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff and to retain proof of service. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2020 ces WOODS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Od AY FILED DATE RULED: 4/7/2020 MICHAEL SAMBORSKY, : Plaintiff, : -against- : 1:20-cv-00298-GHW SARA ROTHSTEIN, doing business as 32B] : ORDER Benefit Funds, ALBERTA GALDRI, doing : business as 32BJ Benefit Funds, and REGINE : BRETON doing business as : 32BJ Benefit Funds, : Defendants. : on X GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Michael Samborsky’s application for the court to request pro bono counsel is denied without prejudice to renew at a later date. There is insufficient information before the Court at this time to make the necessary assessment of plaintiffs claims under the standards set forth by the Second Circuit in Hodge v. Police Officers, including whether plaintiffs claim is “likely to be of substance.” 802 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1986). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore 7” forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 US. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt No. 10. Defendants’ counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff and to retain proof of service. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2020 ces WOODS United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Samborsky v. Rothstein, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samborsky-v-rothstein-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack