Samarra v. West

13 Vet. App. 249, 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1406, 1999 WL 1271030
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Samarra v. West. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Vet. App. 196
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided December 30, 1999·No. No. 97-632·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On November 8, 1999, the Clerk received a letter from the appellant, through counsel, stating: “I believe the September 24, 1999, decision from the [Department of Veterans Affairs] regional office resolves all issues on appeal. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office.” On November 24, 1999, the Court issued an- order that offered the appellant 20 days in which to show cause why the Court should not (1) construe his November 8, 1999, letter as a motion to withdraw his Notice of Appeal (NOA) and (2) grant that construed motion and dismiss the appeal. Samarra v. West, [250]*25013 Vet.App. 196 (1999). The appellant has not responded.

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s November 8, 1999, letter is construed as a motion to withdraw his NO A, and that the construed motion is granted. It is further

ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samarra v. West, 13 Vet. App. 249, 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1406, 1999 WL 1271030 (Cal. 1999).

13 Vet. App. 249 (Samarra v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samarra v. West
13 Vet. App. 196 (Veterans Claims, 1999)