Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/SAMANTHA ROUSSELL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

SAMANTHA ROUSSELL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in SAMANTHA ROUSSELL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 So. 3d 100 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2020·No. 20-0460·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SAMANTHA V. ROUSSELL, Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee.

No. 4D20-460

[November 19, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-17- 006417.

Samantha V. Roussell, Miramar, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, and William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMANTHA ROUSSELL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

SAMANTHA ROUSSELL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (SAMANTHA ROUSSELL v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.