SAMANTHA MULLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of SAMANTHA MULLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SAMANTHA MULLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
SAMANTHA MULLINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-2146
[October 10, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562015CF001284A.
Samantha Mullins, Florida City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Samantha Mullins appeals from the trial court’s denial of her petition for clarification of sentence. We affirm without prejudice.
Appellant claims the written sentence conflicts with the oral pronouncement, which can state a claim for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Stukel v. State, 251 So. 3d 193, 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). However, appellant did not attach the sentencing transcript or sentencing documents. Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice for appellant to file a rule 3.800(a) motion including the portions of the record necessary to address her claims. Id.
Affirmed without prejudice.
WARNER, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SAMANTHA MULLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samantha-mullins-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.