Samantha G. v. Concilio de Iglesias de Pentecostales Vision Para Hoy, Inc.

118 A.D.3d 487, 987 N.Y.S.2d 141

This text of 118 A.D.3d 487 (Samantha G. v. Concilio de Iglesias de Pentecostales Vision Para Hoy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Samantha G. v. Concilio de Iglesias de Pentecostales Vision Para Hoy, Inc., 118 A.D.3d 487, 987 N.Y.S.2d 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered November 5, 2012, which granted defendant 1460 Grand Concourse Co., LLC.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly concluded that plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of an issue of fact concerning whether: (1) defendant Concourse had notice of her residency in the apartment prior to June 2005; (2) defendant Concourse had notice of any hazardous lead condition which it failed to abate prior to the notice from the Department of Health in or about April 2005; and (3) plaintiff’s exposure to lead in defendant Concourse’s apartment, if any, proximately caused her injuries (see e.g. Michaud v Lefferts 750, LLC, 87 AD3d 990, 991-993 [2d Dept 2011]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining argument and find it unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Gische and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michaud v. Lefferts 750, LLC
87 A.D.3d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D.3d 487, 987 N.Y.S.2d 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samantha-g-v-concilio-de-iglesias-de-pentecostales-vision-para-hoy-inc-nyappdiv-2014.