Samantha Foltz v. Chad Czerneski
This text of Samantha Foltz v. Chad Czerneski (Samantha Foltz v. Chad Czerneski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 3, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146815-6 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, SAMANTHA FOLTZ, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146815 COA: 313528 Ingham CC: 99-014099-DP CHAD CZERNESKI, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/ AMI DAILY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146816 COA: 313532 Ingham CC: 99-010966-DP CHAD CZERNESKI, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2013 orders of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 3, 2013 s0826 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Samantha Foltz v. Chad Czerneski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samantha-foltz-v-chad-czerneski-mich-2013.