Saman Showani v. the Attorney General of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 16, 2019
Docket03-19-00155-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Saman Showani v. the Attorney General of Texas (Saman Showani v. the Attorney General of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saman Showani v. the Attorney General of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00155-CV

Saman Showani, Appellant

v.

The Attorney General of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-AG-18-000884, THE HONORABLE J. ANDREW HATHCOCK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on April 1, 2019.

On April 2, 2019, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice

requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report

regarding this appeal by April 12, 2019. Further, the notice advised appellant that his failure to

comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To

date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the

clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 16, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Saman Showani v. the Attorney General of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saman-showani-v-the-attorney-general-of-texas-texapp-2019.