Sam Sims, Jr. v. United States of America, Eulis Britt v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Sam Sims, Jr. v. United States of America, Eulis Britt v. United States

249 F.2d 39, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3913

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 1957

Docket13192_1

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 39 (Sam Sims, Jr. v. United States of America, Eulis Britt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sam Sims, Jr. v. United States of America, Eulis Britt v. United States, 249 F.2d 39, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3913 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgments in these consolidated cases are challenged by appellants on the ground that the evidence used at the trial by the Court without a jury was obtained by search of a building without a valid search warrant having been obtained for making the search. Motions to suppress the evidence were overruled.

The Government contends, and the District Judge so ruled, that because the building was being used at the time as the place of business of a “numbers bank” and that an immediate major crisis and emergency existed due to the known presence of the agents and the imminent destruction or concealment of the evidence, which the Government agents acting in good faith had reason to believe, and since the procurement of a search warrant would have taken considerable time, the search without a warrant was valid.

In our opinion the ruling in this case is controlled by McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 69 S.Ct. 191, 93 L.Ed. 153, which involved a very similar factual situation, and in which the search was held illegal. See also: Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 68 S.Ct. 367, 92 L.Ed. 436; Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 33, 46 S.Ct. 4, 70 L.Ed. 145. The motions to suppress should have been sustained.

The judgments are reversed and the cases remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgments in these consolidated cases are challenged by appellants on the ground that the evidence used at the trial by the Court without a jury was obtained by search of a building without a valid search warrant having been obtained for making the search. Motions to suppress the evidence were overruled.

The Government contends, and the District Judge so ruled, that because the building was being used at the time as the place of business of a “numbers bank” and that an immediate major crisis and emergency existed due to the known presence of the agents and the imminent destruction or concealment of the evidence, which the Government agents acting in good faith had reason to believe, and since the procurement of a search warrant would have taken considerable time, the search without a warrant was valid.

In our opinion the ruling in this case is controlled by McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 69 S.Ct. 191, 93 L.Ed. 153, which involved a very similar factual situation, and in which the search was held illegal. See also: Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 68 S.Ct. 367, 92 L.Ed. 436; Agnello v. United States, 269 U.S. 20, 33, 46 S.Ct. 4, 70 L.Ed. 145. The motions to suppress should have been sustained.

The judgments are reversed and the cases remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.2d 39, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-sims-jr-v-united-states-of-america-eulis-britt-v-united-states-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack